B — systematic reviews with limitations 2 sources · checked 2026-09-04

Body-fat measurements

"My scale says 24 percent body fat. Is that right?" Probably not to within several points — and the same is true of most ways of getting that number.

The methods, by accuracy

What the app does without a measurement

When no DXA or Bod Pod result is entered, the app estimates body fat from BMI, age and sex with a 1991 population equation whose standard error is about four percentage points. That is a deliberately modest estimate used only to derive fat-free mass for an energy floor; the BMI calculator shows the same figure so you can see what the app is working from. A measured value replaces it.

The honest use

If you want one true number, get a DXA or Bod Pod scan. If you want to know whether a programme is working, weigh under the same conditions, measure your waist monthly, and — if you like the scale's body-fat reading — read it the same way every time and watch its direction, never its value. A reading that moves three points in a week has measured your hydration.

Sources

  1. Oliver CJ et al., „The validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to a four-compartment model in healthy adults: a systematic review“, J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2026;11(1):65 — systematic review (12 проучвания)
    Limitation: референцията е 4C модел; домашните кантари са най-простият клас и грешат най-много; полезен за тренд при постоянни условия, не за число
    cited, not reproduced
  2. Deurenberg et al., BMI/age/sex body-fat equation — original model study
    Limitation: SEE около 4.1 percentage points body fat
    cited, not reproduced

Educational information, not medical advice. It does not replace a consultation with a doctor or a registered dietitian. Not for people under 18, during pregnancy or breastfeeding, or with a history of an eating disorder — talk to a professional first.