A — several systematic reviews or trials agree 2 sources · checked 2026-09-04

Side by side

"Keto or fasting — what is actually the difference?" This table is the answer in one screen. It is built from the same structured records that the individual pages are written from, so a cell here cannot say something the page does not: every number carries the id of its source, and a pattern that sets no rule for something says "not set" and why, rather than filling the gap with a plausible figure.

Two things to keep in mind while reading. At twelve months, the differences in weight loss between named patterns are small in the trials that compared them head to head; the columns that separate people are the practical ones lower down — cooking, eating out, the table you sit at. And the "strongest evidence for" row is often not about weight at all, which is worth knowing before choosing a pattern for its reputation.

The filters hide the columns that do not fit your week. If nothing survives them, that is information too.

Atkins Points-based programmes Zone DASH Flexitarian Mediterranean pattern Nordic pattern Volumetrics Paleo Vegan eating Vegetarian eating Ketogenic diet Lower-carbohydrate eating Low-fat eating Higher-protein eating Low glycaemic index Portion control 5:2 fasting Alternate-day fasting Time-restricted eating (16:8)
Family commercial programme commercial programme commercial programme dietary pattern dietary pattern dietary pattern dietary pattern dietary pattern exclusion exclusion exclusion lower carbohydrate lower carbohydrate lower fat method method method meal timing meal timing meal timing
Energy approach eat to appetite (ad libitum) a fixed daily ceiling a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose eat to appetite (ad libitum) a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose a deficit you choose eat to appetite (ad libitum) eat to appetite (ad libitum) eat to appetite (ad libitum)
Carbohydrate 20–100 g/day S-KETO-DEFINITION-2015 not set 40–40 % S-GE-BMJ-2020 not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set ≤ 50 g/day S-KETO-DEFINITION-2015
≤ 10 % S-KETO-DEFINITION-2015
50–130 g/day S-KETO-DEFINITION-2015
≤ 26 % S-KETO-DEFINITION-2015
not set not set not set not set not set not set not set
Fat not set not set 30–30 % S-GE-BMJ-2020 not set not set 35–40 % S-PREDIMED-2018 not set not set not set not set not set not set not set 20–30 % S-NASEM-AMDR-2005 not set not set not set not set not set not set
Protein not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set not set 1.2–1.6 g/kg S-AHS-PROTEIN-2020 not set not set not set not set not set
Eating window / meals 8 hours S-TREAT-2020
2–3 meals S-TREAT-2020
Excluded or limited
excluded: added sugar
limited: grains, starchy vegetables, fruit, legumes
limited: added sugar, processed foods
limited: added sugar, processed foods
limited: added sugar, meat, processed foods
limited: meat
limited: meat, added sugar, processed foods, alcohol
limited: meat, added sugar, processed foods
limited: processed foods, added sugar
excluded: grains, legumes, dairy, processed foods, added sugar
excluded: meat, fish, eggs, dairy
excluded: meat, fish
excluded: added sugar, grains, starchy vegetables
limited: legumes, fruit, dairy
excluded: added sugar
limited: grains, starchy vegetables, fruit
limited: processed foods, added sugar
nothing
limited: added sugar, processed foods
nothing nothing nothing nothing
Evidence grade B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations D mechanism, opinion or marketing B systematic reviews with limitations C single trials or observational data C single trials or observational data C single trials or observational data B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations A several systematic reviews or trials agree A several systematic reviews or trials agree A several systematic reviews or trials agree B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations B systematic reviews with limitations
Weight loss at 12 months differences between named diets small and mostly not significant at twelve months, with low certainty S-GE-BMJ-2020 the largest points programme showed about 2.6 % greater weight loss than control or education at twelve months; a meal-delivery programme about 4.9 %; results reported with a published correction S-COMMERCIAL-2015 differences between named diets small and mostly not significant at twelve months, with low certainty S-GE-BMJ-2020 not set not set 4.1–10.1 kg in Mediterranean arms; more than low-fat (2.9–5.0 kg), similar to other comparator diets (4.7–7.7 kg) S-MANCINI-2016 not set not set not set not set not set in the network meta-analysis, low-carbohydrate programmes (Atkins among them) lost about 4–5 kg more than usual diet at six months; at twelve months the differences between named diets were small and mostly not significant S-GE-BMJ-2020 healthy low-carbohydrate −6.0 kg vs healthy low-fat −5.3 kg; no significant difference S-DIETFITS-2018 healthy low-fat −5.3 kg vs healthy low-carbohydrate −6.0 kg; no significant difference S-DIETFITS-2018 not set not set not set the umbrella review reports sustained weight loss at 6–12 months for modified alternate-day fasting of the 5:2 type versus usual eating, with moderate-quality evidence S-IF-UMBRELLA-2021 about 6 % of starting weight with alternate-day fasting versus about 5 % with daily restriction after one year; no significant difference, and more dropout in the fasting group S-ADF-2017 not set
Strongest evidence for a fast, visible start: glycogen and its water in the induction phase, and for some people blunted appetite S-GLYCOGEN-WATER-2015 the structure and the support — regular contact, a group, a simple budget — which is what the trials test, rather than the points formula itself S-COMMERCIAL-2015 a fixed, easily remembered split with a generous share of protein — the part that has evidence behind it, for reasons that have nothing to do with the programme's hormonal theory S-GE-BMJ-2020 lowering blood pressure — the outcome the pattern was designed and tested for; weight is a side effect S-DASH-MA-2016 describing, without a rule, a plant-forward way of eating that many people already keep and that excludes nothing fewer major cardiovascular events in people at high risk S-PREDIMED-2018 an official, sustainability-aware dietary recommendation for a whole region, published under an open licence S-NNR-2023 reducing energy intake within a meal or a day while keeping the amount of food eaten the same — the mechanism the laboratory studies show consistently S-ROLLS-2017 removing the most energy-dense processed foods and sugar in one rule, which for some people is simpler than counting S-PALEO-MA-2019 the largest short-term weight effect among the vegetarian patterns, attributed by the review to energy density and fibre S-VEG-MA-2016 a modest, consistent short-term weight advantage that the review attributes to lower energy density and higher fibre, not to the absence of meat as such S-VEG-MA-2016 a fast, visible start (glycogen and its water in the first week or two) and, for some people, blunted appetite S-GLYCOGEN-WATER-2015 a faster start (water and glycogen) and, for some people, easier appetite control S-GLYCOGEN-WATER-2015 showing, over two years, that macronutrient composition does not decide the result — all four assigned compositions lost similar weight S-POUNDS-LOST-2009 preserving lean mass during a deficit, with the signal strengthening above roughly 1.3 g/kg S-PROTEIN-MA-2024 food choices that are sensible on their own merits — legumes, whole grains, vegetables — whatever they do to the glycaemic curve S-COCHRANE-LOWGI-2023 a consistent effect of portion, package and tableware size on how much people select and eat in a sitting, across 58 studies S-PORTION-COCHRANE-2015 a simpler way for some people to create a weekly deficit — two hard days instead of seven moderate ones S-IF-UMBRELLA-2021 showing, over a full year, that a fasting pattern and a daily deficit of the same energy end in the same place S-ADF-2017 a simpler way for some people to hold a deficit without counting; over twelve weeks −0.94 kg vs −0.68 kg in the control, no significant difference S-TREAT-2020
Worth watching fibre and electrolytes in the induction phase, as for any ketogenic phase nothing nothing sodium — the pattern's defining constraint, mostly hidden in bread, cheese and cured food nothing nothing nothing protein and essential fats — a very low-density plate can be low in both calcium without dairy, and fibre without grains and legumes vitamin B12 — no reliable plant source; supplementation or fortified food is required, not optional; protein per day and per meal; iron, calcium, iodine, omega-3 — each has a plant route that must be deliberate protein per day and per meal — reachable with eggs, dairy, legumes and soy, but not by accident; iron, especially for menstruating women — plant iron is absorbed less well electrolytes (sodium, potassium, magnesium) in the first weeks — the loss of water carries them; fibre — it falls with carbohydrate fibre — it falls together with carbohydrate essential fats and fat-soluble vitamins if fat is pushed far below 20 % of energy kidney function if there is known kidney disease — higher protein is a doctor's call there nothing protein — a smaller portion of everything can leave it short protein on fast days and across the week; eating on the five non-fast days — the deficit disappears if they compensate protein across the week — half the days cannot carry it; the non-fast days: in the trial they were structured at 125 % of needs, not free protein per day — hard to fit into two meals
Cost 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 3 · hard 1 · easy 1 · easy 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 2 · some effort 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy
Cooking effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 3 · hard 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 3 · hard 3 · hard 2 · some effort 3 · hard 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy
Eating out 2 · some effort 1 · easy 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 1 · easy 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 3 · hard 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 1 · easy 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 2 · some effort 3 · hard 2 · some effort
Social friction 3 · hard 1 · easy 2 · some effort 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 3 · hard 3 · hard 2 · some effort 3 · hard 2 · some effort 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 1 · easy 2 · some effort 3 · hard 2 · some effort
Pregnancy and breastfeeding not for doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first not for doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first doctor first not for not for not for
Eating-disorder note on the page no yes no no no no no no no yes no yes no no no no yes yes yes yes
In the app not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule soft context, not a guarantee mediterranean not supported as a rule not supported as a rule soft context, not a guarantee paleo soft context, not a guarantee vegan soft context, not a guarantee vegetarian soft context, not a guarantee ketogenic soft context, not a guarantee lower-carb not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule not supported as a rule

Every number carries the id of the source it was taken from; hover to see it, and find it in the page's source list. "Not set" carries the reason. Practicality scores are editorial: 1 easy, 2 some effort, 3 hard.

Sources

  1. Ge L et al., 14 popular named dietary programmes, network meta-analysis, BMJ 2020;369:m696, PMID 32238384 — systematic review + network meta-analysis (121 RCT, 21 942 участници)
    Limitation: между-диетните разлики са малки и с ниска до умерена сигурност; отпадането е високо; не казва нищо за придържането на конкретен човек
    cited, not reproduced
  2. NICE NG246 + Evidence review F — current official clinical guideline
    Limitation: не дава calculator formula или universal weekly rate; изисква professional support
    cited, not reproduced

Educational information, not medical advice. It does not replace a consultation with a doctor or a registered dietitian. Not for people under 18, during pregnancy or breastfeeding, or with a history of an eating disorder — talk to a professional first.